One Pot Transformation of Steroidal Epoxides using Solid Support

 

M. Mushfiq*, G. Mudgal, Rakhshanda Rehman and Sultanat

Department of Chemistry, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh (U.P) 202002, INDIA

*Corresponding Author E-mail: mushfiqs@rediffmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

The reaction of steroidal epoxides with a mixture of silica gel and sodium chloride gave the products which were confirmed by elemental analysis and spectral data (IR,1 HNMR, 13CNMR).The method is economical, environmentally friendly, convenient, one pot transformation of epoxides.

 

KEYWORDS: Solid support silica gel, steroidal epoxides, sodium chloride.

 

 


 

INTRODUCTION:

The ring opening reactions of epoxides are intriguing research area that can still be considered interesting. Halohydrins are of considerable importance in the synthesis of natural products and many organic transformations. The isolation of some chlorinated withanolides from the plants Withania and Actinus species was reported1 and suggested that the chlorine atom in these molecules was derived from sodium chloride present in the plants. Therefore, they performed a model reaction on withanolide ‘D’ using sodium chloride on active support (silica gel) and the chlorohydrins was obtained along with some other products. Various ring opening reactions of epoxides with different reagents were also reported2,3. Alumina4-9 and silica gel10 provide a reaction site for various interesting transformations. It also provides a reactive surface for the chromatographic conversion of one functional group into another. The use of sodium chloride and silica gel based reaction system are our current interest. In continuation of the above work we describe the use of sodium chloride and silica gel for the transformation of steroidal epoxides I11 and II12 to get chlorohydrins and other products.

 

EXPERIMENTAL:

Melting points were recorded on a Kofler hot block apparatus and are uncorrected. IR spectra were determined in KBr with Perkins Elmer 237 Spectrophotometer.

 

1HNMR spectrum were run in CDCl3 on Bruker AV 400 instrument with TMS as internal standard and its values are given in ppm (δ) 13C NMR were also run in CDCl3 on Bruker DRX 300 and its values are given in ppm (δ). TLC plates were coated with silica gel and spots were developed in iodine chamber.

 

Synthesis of epoxides. Cholesterol or b-sitosterol (4gm) in chloroform (35ml) was treated with a chloroform solution of perbenzoic acid (1.1mole) and kept at 0oC for twenty hours. The mixture was then washed with water, sodium bicarbonate solution (5%), water, sodium thiosulphate solution and again with water. Removal of the solvent and crystallization from acetone gave 3b- hydroxy- 5,6α- epoxy- 5α- cholestane(I), 2.5 gm, m.p 141oC, reported13 m.p. 142o C or 3b- hydroxy- 5,6α- epoxy- 5α- stigmastane (II), 2.2 gm, m.p. 138o C.

 

The epoxide I or II (500mg, 1.2 mmoles) in absolute methanol (200ml) was adsorbed over a powdered mixture of silica gel and NaCl (125g, 2:1).The solvent was evaporated and the dry residue was heated at 100oC for twenty four hours. The product was desorbed over ethyl acetate and the residue was chromatographed over silica gel (20g). Elution with petroleum ether/ether gave the compounds III- VIII (Fig. 1) which were analysed on the basis of their elemental and spectral studies (Table 1and 2).

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:

The reaction product of epoxide I on elution with petroleum ether/ ether (50:1) gave a compound which was analysed for C27H43OCl (positive Beilstein test). The composition indicated that chlorine was incorporated while three hydrogen and oxygen were lost during the reaction. This can be accommodated if we consider epoxide ring opening with addition of HCl followed by loss of a water molecule and oxidation by removal of 2H (oxidation of alcohol to ketone). This leads to various possibilities such as III, IIIa, IIIb or IIIc. The IR spectrum of the compound showed absorption bands at 1710, 1600 and 800 cm-1 and indicated the presence of a nonconjugated carbonyl group, double bond and a carbon chlorine bond. No other significant band was observed. The structure IIIa could be discarded on the basis of IR spectrum as carbonyl group present was nonconjugated in nature. The NMR spectrum showed, complex multiplet centered at δ2.01, with no clear integration, and methyl protons at δ 1.16, 0.76 and 0.68. The absence of any vinylic proton in the region δ 5.60 easily discarded the possibility of IIIa, IIIb or IIIc (Fig. 2). This also suggested that the double present (IR band at 1600) was tetrasubstituted and halogen is vinylic in nature. These observations go in favour of the structure III, which can account for the multiplet centered at δ 2.01 as ascribed to the C2, C4 and C7 methylene protons. 13C NMR spectrum showed peaks at δ199.64 for C3, δ 123.56 for C5 and δ132.67 for C6. On the basis of above spectral data the compound is characterized as 3-oxocholest-5-en-6-yl chloride (III).

 

Fig. 1. Reaction of epoxides I & II using NaCl / silica gel gave the compounds III- VIII

 

Fig. 2. Possible structures of compound III are IIIa, IIIb or IIIc

Further elution with petroleum ether/ ether (7:1) gave a compound IV, which was analysed for C27H44O2 (negative Beilstein test). The IR spectrum of the compound IV showed a band at 1710 cm-1, the broad signal could suggest the presence of two carbonyl groups. No other significant band was observed in the IR spectrum. The NMR spectrum of the compound was also devoid of any peak in the lower field region. A complex multiplet centered at δ2.32 observed as methylene envelope could be assigned to seven methylene protons at C2, C4, C7 and C5 which were α - to carbonyl groups. 13C NMR spectrum showed peaks at δ 189.97 for C3 and δ 180.58 for C6. By comparison with the authentic sample (m.p, mixed m.p, and TLC)14 the compound was identified as 3, 6-dioxo-5α-cholestane (IV).

 

Further elution with petroleum ether/ ether (1:1) gave a compound V, which was analysed for C27H45O2Cl (positive Beilstein test). The IR spectrum of the compound V, showed absorption bands at 3390, 1710 and 760 cm-1 , which were assigned to a hydroxyl group, a nonconjugated carbonyl group and carbon - chlorine bond , respectively. Absence of any band around 1600 cm-1 suggested the absence of carbon – carbon double bond. The NMR spectrum of the compound showed a multiplet at δ 4.18 integrating for one proton with W1/2 =8Hz and could be assigned to equatorial proton at C6. A broadened singlet at δ 3.35 integrating for single proton and could be assigned to hydroxy proton. A singlet was observed at 3.03 for two protons which could be assigned to methylene protons of C4 in compound V. These methylene protons were adjacent to carbonyl group and other side chain was flanked by OH group. A multiplet at δ2.25 was ascribed to two protons at C2.Other signals as singlets were observed at δ1.17, 0.93, 0.85 and 0.67(other methyl protons). 13C NMR spectrum showed peaks at δ197.40 for C3, δ77.33 for C5 and δ 32.40 for C6.On the basis of above discussion the compound has been identified as 5-hydroxy-3-oxo-5α-cholestan-6β-yl chloride (V) .The structure was again confirmed by the mixed m.p. and TLC with the authentic sample15.

 

Similarly, the reaction product of epoxide II, on elution with petroleum ether/ ether (50:1) gave a compound VI, which was analysed for C29H47OCl (positive Beilstein test). The IR spectrum of the VI, showed absorption bands at 1710, 1620 and 800 cm-1 and suggested the presence of unconjugated carbonyl group, double bond and a carbon halogen bond. In the NMR spectrum absence of any peak between the δ5.0-6.0 showed that no vinylic proton was present, which means that carbon carbon double was tetrasubstituted. A complex multiplet centred at δ2.05 was observed with no clear integration and was assigned to methylene protons at C2, C4 and C7. Other signals were observed at δ1.18, 1.05, 0.96, 0.78 and 0.65(other methyl protons).13C NMR spectrum showed peaks at δ195.26 for C3, δ122.54 for C5 and δ135.63 for C6. On the basis of above spectral data the compound and in analogy with the similar compound can best be characterized as 3-oxostigmast-5-en-6-yl chloride (VI).

 


 

Table 1. Characterization data of newly prepared compounds

Compound

 

Formula

 

Analysis

(calc.)/%

(found)/%

C                                H

Yield

mg   ( %)

M.p.

oC

III

C27H43OCl

 

77.40

77.37

10.32

10.34

118 (23)

130

IV

C27H44O2

 

80.11

80.94

11.12

11.07

130 (26)

163

V

C27H45O2Cl

 

74.19

74.23

10.38

10.30

145 (27)

202

VI

C29H47OCl

 

77.90

77.89

10.60

10.59

120 (22)

289

VII

C29H48O2

 

81.24

81.20

11.28

11.20

135 (27)

198

VIII

C29H49O2Cl

 

74.90

74.88

10.62

10.60

140 (26)

237

 

Table 2. Spectral data of newly prepared compounds

Compound

Spectral data

III

IR, /cm-1: 1710 (C=O), 1600 (C=O), 800 (C-Cl).

1HNMR: δ 2.01(mc, 6H, C2-H2, C4-H2, C7-H2), 1.16, 0.76, 0.68 (methyl protons).

13C NMR: δ C1 (38.52), C2 (23.74), C3 (199.64), C4 (42.33), C5 (123.56), C6 (132.67), C7 (31.76), C8 (31.17), C9 (49.28), C10 (38.69), C11 (21.27). C12 (35.70), C13 (40.17), C14 (56.69), C15 (23.82), C16 (22.80), C17 (56.11), C18 (11.91), C19 (18.72), C20 (28.27), C21 (19.36), C22 (36.15), C23 (24.81), C24 (39.69), C25 (28.09), C26 (22.59), C27 (21.32).

IV

IR,/cm-1: 1710 (C=O).

1HNMR: δ  2.32(mc, 7H, C2-H2, C4-H2, C7-H2, C5-H), 1.11, 0.98, 0.85 and 0.72 (methyl protons).

13C NMR: δ C1 (37.85), C2 (28.06), C3 (189.97), C4 (34.86), C5 (41.17), C6 (180.58),  C7 (32.48), C8 (35.71),  C9 (54.24), C10 (39.58), C11 (20.33), C12 (31.83), C13 (40.04), C14 (55.73), C15 (21.62), C16 (21.33), C17 (40.62), C18 (11.91), C19 (17.12), C20 (28.21), C21 (18.65), C22 (36.16), C23 (22.54), C24 (39.71), C25 (22.83), C26 (20.92), C27 (20.51).

V

IR, /cm-1: 3390(OH), 1710 (C=O), 760(C-Cl).

1HNMR: δ 4.18(1H, m, C6-βH, W1/2=8Hz), 3.35 (1H, m, OH), 2.25 (2H, m, C2-H2), 1.17, 0.93, 0.85 and 0.67 (methyl protons).

13C NMR: δ C1 (27.98), C2 (29.88), C3 (197.40), C4 (42.33), C5 (77.33), C6 (32.40), C7 (35.74), C8 (35.70), C9 (51.33), C10 (42.20), C11 (20.63), C12 (39.95), C13 (42.56), C14 (56.22), C15 (24.17), C16 (28.13), C17 (56.84), C18 (12.15), C19 (11.75), C20 (29.68), C21 (18.63), C22 (39.48), C23 (23.82), C24 (39.84),C25 (28.80), C26 (22.79), C27 (22.53).

VI

IR, /cm-1: 1710(C=O), 1620 (C=C), 800 (C-Cl).

1HNMR: δ 2.05 (mc, 6H, C2-H2, C4-H2, C7-H2), 1.18, 1.05, 0.96, 0.78 and 0.65 (methyl protons).

13C NMR: δ C1 (37.61), C2 (22.82), C3 (195.26), C4 (38.65), C5 (122.54), C6 (135.63), C7 (32.72), C8 (30.12), C9 (46.27), C10 (39.61), C11 (22.22). C12 (35.72), C13 (40.11), C14 (56.64), C15 (23.82), C16 (22.81), C17 (56.11), C18 (11.91), C19 (17.88), C20 (27.26), C21 (19.30), C22 (37.12), C23 (21.11), C24 (38.63), C25 (23.02), C26 (21.54), C27 (20.31), C28 (21.92), C29 (11.96).

VII

IR, /cm-1: 1710(C=O).

1HNMR: δ 2.18 (mc, 7H, C2-H2, C4-H2, C5-H, C7-H2), 1.12, 1.08, 0.97, 0.86 and 0.78 (methyl protons).

13C NMR: δ C1 (38.81), C2 (27.02), C3 (190.91), C4 (35.80), C5 (42.11), C6 (175.51), C7 (22.42), C8 (30.73), C9 (45.21), C10 (36.51), C11 (22.31). C12 (29.83), C13 (41.01), C14 (52.71), C15 (20.61), C16 (23.32), C17 (38.61), C18 (13.94), C19 (18.11), C20 (29.21), C21 (16.61), C22 (36.18), C23 (23.52), C24 (38.71), C25 (23.82), C26 (21.99), C27 (21.52), C28 (20.82), C29 (13.94).

VIII

IR, /cm-1: 3400(OH), 1715(C=O), 760 (C-Cl).

1HNMR: δ 3.35 (1H, m, OH), 4.20 (1H, m, W1/2 = 9Hz, C6-βH), 3.12 (2H, m, C4-H2), 2.13(2H, m, C2-H2), 1.15, 1.08, 0.95, 0.83 and 0.69 (methyl protons).

13C NMR: δ  C1 (27.22), C2 (28.08), C3 (199.16), C4 (38.82), C5 (71.40), C6 (33.66), C7 (34.99), C8 (35.87), C9 (45.83), C10 (42.32), C11 (21.33), C12 (39.77), C13 (42.44), C14 (56.17), C15 (24.05), C16 (29.15), C17 (56.78), C18(15.36), C19 (11.85), C20 (26.11), C21 (18.70), C22 (36.13), C23 (23.05), C24 (50.97), C25 (28.76), C26 (20.58), C27 (20.19), C28 (22.92), C29 (12.96).

 


Further elution with petroleum ether/ ether (8:1) gave the compound VII, which was analysed for C29H48O2 showed negative Beilstein test. The IR spectrum of the VII, showed a band at 1710 cm-1, which was assigned to two groups. Absence of any band above 3000cm-1 indicated the absence of OH group and it could be assumed that the two oxygen atoms present were in the form of carbonyl groups. The NMR spectrum of the compound was also devoid of any significant peak except a multiplet centered at δ 2.18, with no clear integration and could be assigned to methylene protons present at C2, C4and C7 and a single proton at C5 ,all the protons were α to two carbonyl groups. Other singlets were observed at d 1.12, 1.08, 0.97, 0.86 and 0.78 (other methyl protons). 13C NMR spectrum showed peaks at δ 190.91 for C3 and δ 175.51 for C6. On the basis of above spectral data the compound can best be characterized as 3, 6-dioxo-5 α-stigmastane (VII).

 

On further elution with the same solvent (1:1) gave the compound VIII, which was analyzed for C29H49O2Cl showed positive Beilstein test. The IR spectrum of VIII, showed absorption bands at 3400, 1715 and 760 cm-1 for a hydroxyl group, a carbonyl group and carbon chlorine bond. The NMR spectrum of the compound showed a multiplet at δ 4.20 integrating for one proton with W1/2=9Hz which could be ascribed to equatorial proton at C6. A multiplet observed at δ3.35 also integrating for single proton was assigned to hydroxy group. Another  multiplet was observed at δ 3.12, integrating for two protons ascribable to methylene protons of C4. A multiplet centred at δ 2.13 for two protons was assigned to C2-H2.Other singlets were observed at δ1.15, 1.08, 0.95, 0.83 and 0.69 (other methyl protons). 13C NMR spectrum showed peaks at δ199.16 for C3, δ71.40 for C5 and δ33.66 for C6.On the basis of above discussion and in analogy with the similar compound V, obtained in previous case the compound can be characterized as 5-hydroxy-3-oxo-5α-stigmastan-6β-yl chloride (VIII). The putative mechanism of the formation of products are shown (scheme 1 and 2).

 

Scheme 1

 

Scheme 2

 

CONCLUSION:

We conclude that the solid characterization of reaction products III –VIII by spectroscopic methods is a convenient, environmentally friendly, one pot transformation of steroidal epoxides I and II. Above results as well as the mild reaction conditions make the method highly useful.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

The authors are thankful to Chairman Department of Chemistry, AMU, Aligarh for providing necessary research facilities.

 

REFERENCES:

1.       Nittala SS and Lavie D. Studies on the 5β,6β-epoxide opening in withanolides. J. Chem. Soc.Perkin Trans.1. 1982; 2835-2839.

2.       Das B, Reddy VS and Tehseen F. A mild, rapid and highly regioselective ring-opening of epoxides and aziridines with acetic anhydride under solvent-free conditions using ammonium-12-molybdophosphate.  Tetrahedron Lett. 2006; 47: 6865- 6868.

3.       Bhaumik K, Mali UW and Akamanchi K G. High Yield Regioselective Ring Opening of Epoxides Using Samarium Chloride Hexahydrate. Synth.Commun. 2003; 33: 1603-1610.

4.       Ott GH and Reichstein T. Über Gallensuren und verwandte Stoffe. 27. Mitteilung. -Oxyde der beiden 3-Oxy- und der 3-Keto-cholen-(11)-sure. Helv. Chim. Acta. 1943; 26: 1799- 1815.

5.       Sarett LH .A New Method for the Preparation of 17(α)-Hydroxy-20-ketopregnan. J.Am.Chem.Soc.1948; 70: 1454- 1458.

6.       Reich H, Walker FE and Collins RW. Δ4-Cholestene-6-One and Related Compounds. J. Org. Chem. 1951; 16: 1753- 1760.

7.       Soloway AH, Considine WJ, Fukushima DK and Gallagher TF. Some Reactions of Epoxides of Steroid Enol Acetates1. J.Am.Chem.Soc. 1954; 76: 2941- 2943.

8.       Leeds NS, Fukushima DK and Gallagher TF. Studies of Steroid Ring D Epoxides of Enol Acetates; A New Synthesis of Estriol and of Androstane-3β,16α,17β-triol1. J.Am.Chem.Soc. 1954; 76: 2943-2948.

9.       Posner GH and Rogers DZ. Organic reactions at alumina surfaces. Mild and selective opening of epoxides by alcohols, thiols, benzeneselenol, amines, and acetic acid. J.Am.Chem.Soc.1977; 99: 8208-8214.

10.     Kotsuki H and Shimanouchi T. A facile conversion of epoxides to β-halohydrins with silica gel-supported lithium halides. References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.Tetrahedron Lett. 1996;37: 1845- 1848.

11.     Contributed for oral presentation in National Seminar on Recent Trends in Chemical Research (RTCR 2010) held on September 4-6 2010, Department of Chemistry ,Meerut College, Meerut, UP, Book of abstract pp- 54.

12.     Contributed for oral presentation in National Conference on Green Chemistry held on September 16 and 17 2010, Department of Chemistry, SRM University, NCR Campus, Modinagar, UP, Book of abstract pp-106

13.     Fieser L and Fieser M. Steroids, oxo steroids, Reinhold publishing Corporation,New York.1959.

14.     Heilborn IM, Jones ERH and Spring FS. Studies in the sterol group. Part XXXII. The bromination of 6- ketocholestanyl acetate. J. Chem. Soc. (R). 1937;16: 801-805.

15.     Iqbal N. Steroid Trans.Ph.d Thesis,Deptt.Chem. A.M. U. Aligarh. 1987.

 

 

 

Received on 03.01.2011        Modified on 02.02.2010

Accepted on 08.02.2010        © AJRC All right reserved

Asian J. Research Chem. 4(5): May, 2011; Page711-714